Reforming Rule 702 and Creating Hybrid Advisory Panels to Uphold the Sixth Amendment's Right to a Fair Trial
The Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant the right to a fair trial, yet this promise often falls short in cases involving mental illness. Outdated psychiatric doctrines like traditional competency and insanity standards, combined with restrictive evidentiary rules such as Rule 702, limit courts’ ability to fully understand a defendant’s mental state. These limitations undermine fairness by excluding critical insights from lived experience and modern mental health knowle
2 hours ago4 min read


The Equal Protection Clause and Mental Incapacity
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a cornerstone of American civil rights law. It mandates that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been pivotal in various landmark cases, particularly those involving discrimination based on race, gender, and other characteristics. However, one area that often receives less attention is the intersection of the Equal Protection Clause and mental incapa
5 hours ago4 min read


Reforming Mental Health Standards for Fair Trials
The intersection of mental health and the legal system is a critical area that demands urgent attention. As society becomes more aware of mental health issues, the need for reforming mental health standards in the context of fair trials has never been more pressing. The implications of mental health on legal proceedings can significantly affect the outcomes for individuals involved, particularly those who may not fully understand the charges against them or the legal processe
5 hours ago5 min read














