All Articles

The Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant the right to a fair trial, yet this promise often falls short in cases involving mental illness. Outdated psychiatric doctrines like traditional competency and insanity standards, combined with restrictive evidentiary rules such as Rule 702, limit courts’ ability to fully understand a defendant’s mental state. These limitations undermine fairness by excluding critical insights from lived experience and modern mental health knowle

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is a cornerstone of American civil rights law. It mandates that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This clause has been pivotal in various landmark cases, particularly those involving discrimination based on race, gender, and other characteristics. However, one area that often receives less attention is the intersection of the Equal Protection Clause and mental incapa

The intersection of mental health and the legal system is a critical area that demands urgent attention. As society becomes more aware of mental health issues, the need for reforming mental health standards in the context of fair trials has never been more pressing. The implications of mental health on legal proceedings can significantly affect the outcomes for individuals involved, particularly those who may not fully understand the charges against them or the legal processe

The concept of insanity in legal contexts is often misunderstood, leading to misconceptions about its implications and applications. Insanity is not merely a psychological condition; it plays a crucial role in determining criminal responsibility. This blog post aims to unpack the complexities surrounding the legal definition of insanity, its historical evolution, and its practical implications in the courtroom. A gavel symbolizing justice and legal proceedings. The Legal Defi